Zettelkasten Forum

So the main area for what you are talking about is with #2, and the prepend tags I use for capture notes. The main way I determine these is how they work in searches, and how they look in a list. Prep

This introduces complexity. If I go directly to #2, I may miss the fact that I wrote about this before. If I go directly to #1, and find nothing, I will have to "back up and start again", wi

201810200000 Interesting Note #1.txt ... Open Question: Why do we care? #201810200001 ...

I use Ids with accuracy to the second, e.g. 20181018192612, to create MMD references for web links, e.g. [#20181018192612]: Some Person: "Really Amazing Topic", http://youtube.com/videolink/

I use Ids with accuracy to the second, e.g. 20181018192612, to create MMD references for web links, e.g. [#20181018192612]: Some Person: "Really Amazing Topic", <http://youtube.com/videol

It seems that for entries with no author, the dialogue pulls the last available author name, ie, from the entry above it in the bib file. See screenshot #2 below, which shows the culprit, "Lang,&

wxWidgets would have been my choice #2, as every time I checked, it appeared to be very mature and not that hard to use.

lower case. I also have quite an amount of #1, #2, #n's appearing in my notes which are also not tags. This little restrictions sorts out an resonable amount of "false tags". If you have ot

# 201711250024 Working with tocs tags = #sublime_zk #toc <!-- table of contents (auto) --> * [201711250024 Working with tocs](#201711250024-working-with-tocs) * [This is a very long note!](

* Second thing should be a bit improved: #28 #73_ #digitalhealth

#28\ #73_ #digitalhealth” #digitalhealth”<

#28\ #73_ #digitalhealth” #digitalhealth”<

#28\ #73_ #digitalhealth” #digitalhealth”<