How do you find notes and chain of thoughts without backlinks?
Hi all,
I've read lots of threads here about whether backlinks are good or bad, and I'd like to hear from the experience of the more
seasoned ZK users.
How do you find notes and chain of thoughts without backlinks, when your ZK grows up?
TL;DR
My ZK is about 455 notes (some atomic, some literature, etc...).
I'm finding backlinks very useful right now: sometimes I don't remember how to find a note, but I remember a linked note, so
I go to the linked note and, thanks to the backlink, I find the note I was looking for.
But reading your past threads a question arose in my mind: what happens when my ZK grows bigger, say hundreds or
thousands notes?
Furthermore, I realise that the more I get accustomed to backlinks, the more I'm dependent on specific tools such as Obsidian (not all Markdown editors have backlinks).
My goal is to have the most versatile system as possible, that it means: only Markdown text.
That is, I'd like to move to IA Writer, that I like much more: it has wikilcnks, but not backlinks.
Hope it makes sense.
Thank you!
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
(I've realised I've published the thread from an account I created by mistake, and that I can't delete because I'm not able to find the option. I write this comment only to get the notifications on the right email address)
@IvanPsy I rely on tags and structure notes. I do use "backlinks" infrequently, but only when I think the link should go both ways (for whatever reason). So I don't really think of them as backlinks. My tag system is organized and specific, which simplifies finding zettels. For example, see:
https://forum.zettelkasten.de/discussion/comment/19044#Comment_19044
@IvanFerrero, I'm surely not the "seasoned" user you were hoping would reply, but I do have an opinion.
Terminology matters. I don't like the idea of special "backlinks". I prefer the idea of tiers of connectivity. The first tier would be links directly in the note. The second tier would be those notes with links to the first tier note. There are more tiers as you get deeper and deeper until you get to a tier that encompasses your entire ZK.
We use The Archive, which handles the first and second-tier links eloquently with the note list.
In this example, you can see the target note has both of the first-tier linked notes and five notes that are on the second tier. They are essentially what you call backlinks. In my workflow, these links get created over time. This list will grow if this idea thread maintains my attention.
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
Thank you for your reply.
Tags is something I barely took under consideration because I thought they were too much generic, but I like your system.
Worth considering.
Thank you for your reply, and I like your terminology.
Indeed, if we think of links, backlinks and bidirectional links (or whatever) as different tiers, than it makes sense: now we can choose accordingly the tier we need...or that we don't need a specific tier at all in our system.
Here an example of what I mean for "backlinks", I don't know which tier they refer to:
Maybe I understand what you mean by "Linked mentions." Those notes that have a link reference to this target note. In the wonderous and across-the-board brilliant software, The Archive, the note list that appears on the left is full of all the linked mentions for quick access and reference. (See the screenshot in my previous post.)
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
I use Obsidian too.
In my practice I've developed the idea that (automatic) backlinking is a "weak" linking model that I can't use as the main linking model in my note system.
But this doesn't mean that I can't use Obsidian backlinking as a tool that supports me discovering and making manual links, in some cases.
Backlinking, just like making clusters of notes using tagging, can help to discover relationships between notes in a not well mature set of notes (written at the beginning of a new subject, for example). Once discovered, some of the "automatic" links can be promoted to first class links, thing that help to make notes finally more mature.
In my Obsidian automatic backlinking is disabled by default. But when I'm into a note and I'm "feel lost", I activate backlinking panel and take a look at the picture of links and this can help to form chains. It's like a compass.
More generally, anyway, using and maintaining structure notes makes much less necessary the need of that compass. The structure note closest to the note I'm making often acts as the needed compass and already contains part of the chain of thought done previously.
Indeed, I agree: it's a weak linking model.
Nothing to die for, but it comes very handy.
Following up your inspiring insights, I have peace of mind about backlinks.
I see many softwares support it, so I don't bother about future proofing my System.
And even if I'd choose another software that doesn't support them, it doesn't matter because they're not an essential part of my strategy: they're only something that eases my life.
I see.
My ZK is very young, but the more I use it, the more I find myself creating structured notes in order to give meaning to the atomic notes.
In this scenario, backlinks are becoming more and more simple tools to ease my searchings.
I’m completely new to this so I’m wondering; does The Archive allow for creating backlinks or not?
For me, a "backlink" is an ordinary forward link to a particular type of Zettel visited to see what else links there. Those special Zettels are usually index Zettels and category or hub Zettels otherwise. The mechanism works in Zettlr and Obsidian, like the "what links here" pages in Wikimedia.
The Zettelkasten can be indexed "for free" using the Zettels index, as follows: choose some Zettels other than an index Zettel as "entry points" into the Zettelkasten. Add one or more WikiLinks to an index Zettel containing the first letter of one or more words of the title of the Zettel. This creates an index of entry-point Zettels, distributed over the index Zettels, visible from the "Related files" pane of Zettlr and the analogous file pane in Obsidian. A judicious choice of entry-point Zettels will keep the index from becoming cluttered.
Here is the latest version of my self-documenting Zettel template. It includes features I had previously sworn off, such as structure notes and YAML frontmatter. (I'm close to getting rid of Folgezettel in favor of up to five-letter keywords followed by a timestamp.) The complete list of index Zettels is given in the
SEE ALSO
section.ZTEMP.1.0.24.0228 Zettel Template
The Zettel body begins an H1 header. In my system, the H1 header duplicates the immutable, unique ID and title with the following syntax; however, this choice is optional.
Titles aren't immutable, unlike IDs. The Zettel body ends immediately before the SEE ALSO section below.
Customization notes
This section guides personalizing your Zettel template. Adjust these elements to suit your note-taking preferences and workflow. For example, while this template places the immutable ID to the left of the title, some users prefer it to the right.
Definitions
Reference Element Types
WikiLink: A markdown link used within Zettels to interlink them within the Zettelkasten system. It is enclosed in double square brackets and typically includes a unique identifier followed by the title of the linked Zettel.
Title-only WikiLink: This format includes the WikiLink followed immediately by the title of the linked Zettel without additional annotations or explanations, adhering strictly to the format:
[[UniqueID]] Zettel Title
.Hashtags: Hashtags are for thematic categorization and quick reference within your Zettelkasten. Hashtags typically occur in the SEE ALSO section of a Zettel.
Pandoc citations: Pandoc citations have the form
[@citeKey],
whereciteKey
is a citation Key for a citation maintained within a digital references management system such as Zotero or a manually created and maintained reference database.Types of Notes in Zettelkasten
Single-focus Zettels: Focus on one main idea or topic for clarity and precision. Single-focus Zettels form the core of the Zettelkasten.
Structure Notes: Outline and connect Single-focus Zettels under broader themes. They contain sections with annotated WikiLinks to individual Zettels.
Index Notes: Serve as navigational tools within the Zettelkasten, marked by IDs starting with
0000.0000.0
and typically annotated with their title only.More on customization
The list of title-only WikiLinks in the SEE ALSO section is just a starting point. Feel free to modify these links or hashtags to organize your notes better.
Revised Zettel Construction Guidelines
ID and Title:
Main Body:
SEE ALSO Section:
References:
SEE ALSO
[[0000.0000.0000]] INDEX
[[0000.0000.0ABC]] A-B-C
[[0000.0000.0DEF]] D-E-F
[[0000.0000.0GHI]] G-H-I
[[0000.0000.0JKL]] J-K-L
[[0000.0000.0MNO]] M-N-O
[[0000.0000.0PQR]] P-Q-R
[[0000.0000.0STU]] S-T-U
[[0000.0000.0VWX]] V-W-X
[[0000.0000.00YZ]] Y-Z
[[0000.0000.0009]] 0-9
#replace #these #hashtags
References
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
You just need to search for the ID of the note. Then you get all the backlinks to it.
I am a Zettler
I'd argue that it's not a backlink if it's a forward link
Author at Zettelkasten.de • https://christiantietze.de/
Then we have an argument. I tried. 🤷♂️
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
Wow, that was fast. Thank you.