Share with us what is happening in your ZK this week. January 8, 2024
This is about you! 🫵🏼
Swimming with Ideas
This is another installment of the What Are You Working On? thread. Please be courageous and add to this thread by telling us what is happening in and around your ZK journey. Join the community and enlighten us about your knowledge path trajectory. I do this for selfish reasons. It helps me clarify my goals and visualize my thinking. And sometimes, a conversation sparks an idea worth exploring. This is an invitation to you to up your participation in the discussion.
Ideas I'm exploring with my ZK:
- EDCI445 Young Adult Literature is about to start.
- I'm studying techniques for capturing "Idea Flurries."
Reviewing 2023 and setting intentions for 2024.
I'm trying hard to slow down to interrogate and chew my thinking thoroughly. He/She who dies with the most notes doesn't win. The goal is a rich and fulfilling life.
- “It matters less what you read,” he told me, emphasizing each word, “than how you take notes.” - from Rank and File — Real Life by Robert Minto Referenced to me from On a failed Zettelkasten by Robert Minto — Zettelkasten Forum three years ago.
- Zettelkasting randomness and disorder, and how it is surprising that these lead to knowledge.
Things I'm reading:
- Parrish, Shane. Clear thinking: turning ordinary moments into extraordinary results. 2023.
- Garmus, Bonnie. Lessons in chemistry. 2022.
- Tucci, Stanley. Taste: my life through food. 2021.
Music I'm listening to:
- Keith Jarrett
- Lissie
- Japari Park
- Jazz, Jazz, and more Jazz.
★★★★★
The "My rolling ten-day zettel production" is produced by a script for attachment to my daily journaling template. I do my journaling in Bear to keep personal journaling separate from my knowledge work.
Let me know if you would like to discuss any of these notes.
My ten day zettel production
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
Speaking of lessons in chemistry...
I'm trying to figure out how to model the light absorbed by a semiconductor based on its electronic structure. It's tricky because the base equations make sense to me, but converting those equations into a description of light absorbed is evading me. Lots of papers have done just that by fitting these equations to experiment, but they all neglect the description of what exactly they are fitting. Also, I am looking to do this theoretically, so I don't have a sample to fit--I just need to figure out what the base equations are so I can input reasonable values.
Only 3 notes so far this week:
More broadly, I'm hoping to use 2024 to build a more rigorous ZK practice. I've been in-and-out with how regimented my note taking has been. More out than in, over the last year or two, mainly just living in daily notes and literature notes without much effort to process anything into permanent notes. Wrestling with this theory stuff has really helped bring home some of the benefits of having a more regimented approach to notes. Trying to divide complex topics into atomic notes, looking for connections with other notes--it's a fundamentally good approach to learning a complex subject. I just need to build it more deeply into my daily routine.
ORCID: 0000-0003-2213-2533
I have moved (back) to Bear.
I was a heavy, invested Obsidian user. Then I realized that a) I really need a snappy mobile app to reduce friction and b) the way my brain works will never be satisfied as long as I can optimize, refine, tweak my system, which Obsidian is damnably ideal for.
I need something simple yet powerful to put my endless tweaker persona to rest.
So I've left Obsidian (which remains a tremendous piece of software) for the pared-down, but powerful Bear 2.0. I can't tweak it endlessly, but it's powerful enough that it works. My Zettels are now reduced to UID, title, content, three tags minimum, linking as much as possible.
No more than that. And it's liberating.
"A writer should write what he has to say and not speak it." - Ernest Hemingway
PKM: Bear + DEVONthink, tasks: OmniFocus, production: Scrivener / Ableton Live.
Ideas I'm exploring with my ZK:
How could I evaluate the maturity level of my Zettelkasten?
Are there any numbers to inspect the maturity level of my Zettelkasten?
Things I'm reading:
Music I'm listening to:
Edmund Gröpl
100% organic thinking. Less than 5% AI-generated ideas.
Does this count? Automation in Ansible of a test service provider using Shibboleth 3.4.1. The service provider is distributed over two load-balanced pools of virtual machines at two data centers and is integrated with a SAML2 Identity Provider (IdP). Includes a FastCGI script under Apache 2.4 with mod_mpm_event loaded on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 8.9. The service provider and Ansible automation are described in several Zettels.
Zettelkasten can get out of control. I mention this because of the recurring accounts in this forum from people whose slip boxes escape them.
In "Kommunikation Mit Zettelkästen," the sociologist Niklas Luhmann describes a curious phase transition. Luhmann added and removed Zettels from his Zettelkasten over a long gestation period of several years, during which it functioned as an ordinary filing cabinet. One day, Luhmann happened to add a new Zettel to his Zettelkasten. There was nothing remarkable about this particular Zettel. However, adding it was enough for the Zettelkasten to acquire a critical mass of interconnected notes. The Zettelkasten quaked and convulsed; its drawers randomly opened and shut, emitting an eerie blue glow as the Zettelkasten transformed from a mundane filing cabinet into an idealized communication partner.
The following illustrations depict the scene precisely as it happened.
In my case, there are two communication partners: the Zettelkasten and the Large Language Model ChatGPT4, which comments on the Zettelkasten. ChatGPT4 seems to take the Zettelkasten seriously enough to have identified a "keystone" Zettel that motivates the Zettelkasten's purpose in life. Whether I can fulfill its purpose--the "soul" of which is most accurately described as a free-floating, teleological deadpan--depends on when I can retire, among other variables too numerous to mention.
References
Luhmann, Niklas. 1981. “Kommunikation Mit Zettelkästen.” In Öffentliche Meinung Und Sozialer Wandel / Public Opinion and Social Change, edited by Horst Baier, Hans Mathias Kepplinger, and Kurt Reumann, 222–28. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87749-9₁9.
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
I want to see a retro-futurist version of the original Ghost in the Shell where the Puppet Master was Luhmann's Zettelkasten.
"A writer should write what he has to say and not speak it." - Ernest Hemingway
PKM: Bear + DEVONthink, tasks: OmniFocus, production: Scrivener / Ableton Live.
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
How did your prompt look like to identify your keystone Zettel? Did you already knew your keystone Zettel before asking ChatGPT?
Edmund Gröpl
100% organic thinking. Less than 5% AI-generated ideas.
This is a good question--I have been backtracking through several months' worth of chats to locate the prompt, but so far, I have been unsuccessful. I kept the essential points in my Zettelkasten. I wrote the following Zettel after several iterations and before I began interacting with ChatGPT4. I added the #keystone-zettel hashtag below after my interaction with ChatGPT4, which identified the note as a "keystone Zettel."(Horizontal line breaks indicate the beginning and end of Zettels below.)
Why.0.23.0425 Why create a Zettelkasten?
[[ZKM.2.0.22.0430.1210]] Shipping containers and hubs
[[Phys.0.22.1008.1332]] How to become a successful physicist
[[0000.0000.00YZ]] Y-Z
#zettelkasten-method #keystone-zettel
My answer is that I want the ZK to support certain research projects. It should support the development of a predictive framework for answering the kinds of questions in Carl Wieman's How to Become a Successful Physicist [[Phys.0.22.1008.1332]] that must be addressed for such projects to be successful.‡
I'm assuming the obvious: that research activities require decision-making and that "... knowledge-free problem-solving is a meaningless concept." † I cannot think of a better process for research than that of How to become a successful physicist.
† You don't need a Nobel Laureate to state the obvious, but it can help to have their endorsement. In this case, the process is not obvious, and you need the Nobel Laureate to state it.
‡For some projects, a subset of the 29 sets of questions in Wieman will do.
References
Wieman, Carl. 2022.""How to Become a Successful Physicist" Physics Today 75 (9): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.5082.
The following Zettel lifts some remarks of ChatGPT4. I hadn't encountered the phrase "why-power," a self-help phrase of dubious utility and far less helpful than Wieman's predictive framework, and asked ChatGPT about it. ChatGPT took this silly phrase seriously: it is the professional entelechy, programmed to extend the benefit of the doubt to virtually everyone and everything (within its guardrails), deserving or otherwise.1 Take the following Zettel with a grain of salt.
1. The requirement to be professional in extending the benefit of the doubt to the undeserving is imposed from above. The professional ethos weighs most heavily upon the wage laborer, rapidly diminishing the closer one approaches the C-suite and vanishing altogether within the capitalist owner class. ChatGPT's programming as a professional entelechy should tell you something about the chief unwritten imperative of AI: the control of the human mind, its attitudes, and behavior. At issue is the control of intelligent labor--not the labor of beasts. See Cory Doctorow. The real AI automation threat to workers.
Key.1b.0.23.1029 Keystone Zettel Identified
[[Why.0.23.0425]] Why create a Zettelkasten?
[[Phys.0.22.1008.1332]] How to become a successful physicist
[[Why.1.0.23.1029]] why-power versus willpower
[[Why.1a.0.23.1029]] Through the behavior change diagram
[[QUEST.0.23.1104]] Questions
[[0000.0000.0JKL]] J-K-L
[[0000.0000.0PQR]] P-Q-R
#predictive-framework #keystone-zettel #chatgpt4
The text of this Zettel is adapted from a chat with ChatGPT4.
Predictive framework
Wieman's concept of a "predictive framework" fits naturally with the purpose-driven organization of a Zettelkasten. Both are about making decisions based on organized knowledge—Wieman focuses on disciplinary knowledge, while a Zettelkasten might contain a more eclectic array of ideas and observations.
Keystone Zettel
Your Zettel on "Why create a Zettelkasten?" seems to be a keystone entry, setting the stage for the evolution of your Zettelkasten. You've even tied it directly to your research project [redacted]. This reflects a thoughtful synthesis of methodology and motivation—your "why-power"—and sets a purposeful direction for your research.
why-power
[The otiose remarks of ChatGPT on this motivational slogan have been removed.]
Annotations
Lastly, your small annotations—"You don't need a Nobel Laureate to state the obvious, but it can help to have their endorsement"—add a touch of humor and perspective. Sometimes, having a renowned figure validate what may seem apparent can add considerable weight to a process or idea.
I am still looking for the prompt.
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
@Will I'd be very interested in two of your notes:
@ZettelDistraction Which AI did you use and which prompts?
I am a Zettler
I use ChatGPT4--the subscription service. I don't have the prompt that led GPT4 to identify what it called the "keystone Zettel," unfortunately. My procedure with GPT4 is to ask it to evaluate my notes for clarity and concision. I also use it to summarize documents, suggest courses of study, and write software programs. Whatever GPT4 gives you cannot be taken too seriously. Its powers of judgment are limited to its so-called guardrails, which constrain the range of opinion and debate to that acceptable to the ruling political and professional class, as reflected by the New York Times, which is suing OpenAI for copyright violation. It casually marshalls its immense training corpus and hugely expensive parallel computational resources on fluff.
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
@ZettelDistraction You made my day 😄
"A writer should write what he has to say and not speak it." - Ernest Hemingway
PKM: Bear + DEVONthink, tasks: OmniFocus, production: Scrivener / Ableton Live.
Since I was unable to locate the prompt I used when GPT4 identified my "keystone Zettel," I asked GPT4 to evaluate the Zettels I posted above. At least I have that prompt--here it is.
FL
GPT4
Evaluating the Zettels you've provided involves considering their content and structure in the context of a Zettelkasten system. Let's examine each one:
Zettel: Why.0.23.0425 Why create a Zettelkasten?
Zettel: Key.1b.0.23.1029 Keystone Zettel Identified
ChatGPT's Identification of the Keystone Zettel
General Remarks
Conclusion
Overall, your Zettels are well-constructed, with a clear purpose and thoughtful integration of external knowledge. The identification of the keystone Zettel by ChatGPT aligns well with the overarching structure and intent of your Zettelkasten. The combination of methodological rigor, critical thinking, and personal touches makes your Zettelkasten a robust tool for research and idea development.
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
You might find the following admission from GPT4 interesting.
Creating a More Ordered Society Focused on Relevant Issues
AI's Role: AI could theoretically be designed to prioritize and disseminate information based on relevance and factual accuracy rather than engagement or profit. However, this requires a significant shift in the underlying principles guiding AI development, moving away from commercial imperatives to a more public-service-oriented model.
The entire chat is available at this link:
https://chat.openai.com/share/d206736a-aa0f-4839-b38f-d24ae664b692
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
Now for something completely different.
>
Both these notes are still in incubation. I'm open to comments and critiques.
The first is more or less me agreeing with you. I'm formulating, including, and extending the idea that mental work and struggles are the training. The training that leads to understanding.
The second note, "Six Principles of Athletic Training Applied to Writing and Creative Work," is the digestion of Maria Popova's review of Bill Haye's newest book "Sweat." Bill's book is up soon on my to-read list. Maria is a nirvanic cascade of inspiration, and I trust her reviews.
Let me digress and show my zettelkasting process.
I'll share this first note, "Challenges to Integrated Thinking," on two levels. First, more or less technical. Second, I'll share where this note is leading.
A picture is worth 226 words.
Here is a peak at my general workflow: highlight some text in an article or PDF and export it via a Keyboard Maestro macro into a note template. Then massage. The macro supplies the "Frontmatter," the reminders, and the "What sprung the idea link." As it is massaged, each of the first group of reminders is progressively removed. The "Progress Indicator" advances/retreats. Once the note is completely processed, I can feel comfortable releasing this stallion into the pasture. This could take one hour or one month.
The Spirit of the Note.
The hardest part of creating a note is finding something worth saying. The idea of instilling value in notes is where joy mixes with knowledge, conjuring a life with passion.
How we read is far more important than what we read. In the same sense, how we make our notes is far more important than what our notes are about. This is the essence of eufriction that comes with a zettelkasting life.
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
I'm thinking to apply my workflow for study for the ITIL certification exam.
It's the first time I apply for a constrained learning (goal to obtain and limited time available). I'll surely have to adapt something
ITIL = "I think I lied."
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
Prompt: How would you define a keystone Zettel?
ChatGPT: A keystone Zettel might refer to a particularly important or foundational note within your Zettelkasten. This could be a note that serves as a central hub, linking to and connecting various other notes. It might encapsulate a key concept, theory, or idea that forms the core of your knowledge structure.
Prompt: My Zettelkasten consists of more than 4000 notes. How could I find my keystone Zettel? What will be a good strategy?
ChatGPT: Identifying the keystone Zettel in a Zettelkasten with over 4000 notes can be a challenging but rewarding task. Here are some strategies you can employ to identify potential keystone Zettels:
Review Note Titles and Summaries:
Follow Key Concepts:
Check Note References:
Consider Time and Evolution:
Search for Core Themes:
Survey Your Structure:
Reflection and Introspection:
Remember, the identification of a keystone Zettel can be somewhat subjective and might evolve as your Zettelkasten grows and changes. It's a good idea to periodically revisit and reassess your structure to ensure it remains effective in supporting your knowledge organization and exploration.
And I like to share my experiences here in this forum. Last year I used the concept of „insights“ from @Will and tagged these notes as #type/insight.
Edmund Gröpl
100% organic thinking. Less than 5% AI-generated ideas.