Share with us what is happening in your ZK this week. September 19, 2023
Swimming with Ideas
Another installment of the What Are You Working On? thread.
Add to this thread by telling us what is happening in and around your ZK journey. Join the community and enlighten us about your knowledge path trajectory. I do this for selfish reasons. It helps me clarify my goals and visualize my thinking. And sometimes, a conversation sparks an idea worth exploring.
Ideas I'm thinking about:
- The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Linguistic Relativity. Together, these ideas present the notion that language shapes experience. Maybe I have a warped understanding of this. This is obvious when considering self-talk. The language we use when we talk to ourselves dictates our moods, affect, actions, behaviors, and total experience. This is good news. Changing how we talk to ourselves and the stories we tell ourselves will change our experience—the role of methodeutic language or 'speculative rhetoric' as it steers cognitive understanding of the world.
- I'm a judgment machine. Comparisons and self-criticism are sneaky and ubiquitous. I'm not talking about "I'm a failure." I'm talking about "Shouldn't I spend more time exercising, in the outdoors, walking, zettelkasting?" and other subtle ways I self-evaluate and am critical of my behavior.
- Push above what I think is my "reading level" to achieve mastery by reading more books that present more profound ideas. If I want to understand bigger ideas, I must read books with greater ideas to grasp the deeper concepts essential for remarkable achievements. It's not enough to read a lot. To do extraordinary things, I must read books that stretch my mind.
- Muscle mass preservation during weight loss in a 66-year-old male.
Things I'm reading:
- Lispector, Clarice and Costa, Margaret Jull and Patterson, Robin and Valente, Paulo Gurgel. Too much of life: the complete crônicas. 2022.
- Siegel, Ronald. The extraordinary gift of being ordinary: finding happiness right where you are. 2022.
- Blum, Andrew. The weather machine: a journey inside the forecast. 2019.
- Davis, Lydia. Essays one. 2020.
Music I'm listening to:
★★★★★
The "My rolling ten-day zettel production" is produced by a script for attachment to my daily journaling template. I do my journaling in Bear to keep personal journaling separate from my knowledge work.
My ten day zettel production
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
Just finished preparing a 1-hour presentation / lecture for a group of Young Professional Engineers on "Avoiding Burnout by Intent, Resilience and Balance", to be delivered tomorrow via webinar. I relied heavily on my ZK in pulling out and connecting different ideas - what a great resource it has become after several years of steady building / feeding / nurturing.
Serendipitously, yesterday I listened to a Guardian Masterclass on "The Expectation Effect" by David Robson (2 hours long; took lots of notes, which I'll have to distill into my ZK). His presentation was interesting and inviting of more study.
Well, I'm new to Zettelkasten, and I barely begin to adopt this system.
Currently I have 100+ notes on my Apple notes and numerous tags.
I start to worry how exactly should I find a note under this circumstance.
Ideas I'm thinking about:
Things I'm reading:
Music I'm listening to:
@Will
Look up: Kneesovertoesguy. Muscle mass preservation is the by product of proper strength training.
I am a Zettler
@Will The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Linguistic Relativity.
In my personal experience, the hypothesis is grounded in reality. The position is muddled with all kinds of strawmaning (like the impossibility of translation). That makes it annoying to read about it.
I think of each language as a flavor of thinking. Languages don't force us into a completely different way of thinking. But they provide little nudges. So, there are conservative languages that still make use of archaic categories of thinking (in turkish, people are named after concepts, animals and things like that for example - my wife is name roughly translated to queen of roses). Others are very permeable like English which might be due to the frequent conquests by the Romans, French and Vikings (and there infusion of their words).
I am a Zettler
@Sascha, I'm thinking about 'The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Linguistic Relativity', not so much about trans-cultural languages but how this applies within a culture, but how the internal language I use shapes my experience. Can I use different words in my self-talk to elicit richer, more fulfilling experiences? Is the language I'm using to tell myself stories about my experience keeping me from connecting with what is real instead of what I think is real?
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
@Will Your brain is a sophisticated, organic computer that takes input from various senses and simulates the world around you. The input isn't perfect and so neither is the brain's model. In fulfilling its purposes, it is also a prediction machine. So, what is "real"? As far as we know, it is the model in our brain. Change the model - change our reality
@GeoEng51, I don't have a very sophisticated brain, and the analogy of comparing it to a computer doesn't resonate with me. Yes, I am a predictive machine, but that misses the point. The words I choose to use can either enhance or diminish the quality of my experiences. This is how I view 'The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Linguistic Relativity.'
Will Simpson
My zettelkasten is for my ideas, not the ideas of others. I don’t want to waste my time tinkering with my ZK; I’d rather dive into the work itself. My peak cognition is behind me. One day soon, I will read my last book, write my last note, eat my last meal, and kiss my sweetie for the last time.
kestrelcreek.com
GitHub. Erdős #2. Problems worthy of attack / prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein. Alter ego: Erel Dogg (not the first). CC BY-SA 4.0.
Ideas I'm thinking about:
Things I'm reading:
Music I'm listening to:
I want to look deeper into the Embedded Model, essentially to build
my own more advanced searching engine with the help of OpenAI.
Currently, what I found is that searching the content using the
keywords to search the title. That is the most frequently, 95% of
time is done in that way. What I found that the searching the in
entire database using regular expression is not that frequently.
It's only when I intend to do that. Most of the time is that I am
frustrated to find a certain thing that I am pretty sure is somewhere
in the database. But I found this sort of things happen less and
less. So if I have this sort of system that cannot understand my
literary meaning, but I can understand the context that I have no key
words in my mind. That's probably can help to build a better search
engine.
Also have do some minimum tasks and find that the basic principle is
quite easy to understand. But the things that is rather hard is how I
kind of forcing myself to building a structure that can works when I
am writing the context. The second thing is, when the searching
happened, it definitely requires a similar asynchronous mode to show
the more things I use, which is the key keywords in the search map
of keyword matching. But at the same time, it can display the least
more advanced results. I'm also thinking about A computation that can
also display the compositional result interact to chatgpt. Because I
frequently not frequent, because II found that I II I'd like to
search a open conversation about a particular things, sometimes but
enhance to continue the conversation or sometimes to just remind the
context I was talking about.
Also find some time to fine-tune my interact with the OpenAI API to
do things more more things, I mean the revision, paragraphing,
checking error, all those very basic things within the Emacs.
Perhaps, I communicate just half of my point. My personal interest is in personal application, exclusively.
Examples:
I think the base premise needs to be that language has roots in reality. Linguistic relativity is not relevant to concepts of basic things like "table" or "cat". A healthy person is grounded in reality and the physical world, almost like having an unfiltered connection to the animalistic side of us.
The more you leave this immediate world, the more relative language becomes. It is almost a relativity of relativity (Luhmann would be proud of this word salad).
So, using the SWH as a thinking tool has three layers to it:
I am a Zettler