My Method of Zettelkasten
Hi, I am a student currently taking computer engineering. I have been taking zettelkasten for the past three months. I have learned through asking AI but it seems almost impractical so I am asking the community. I use emacs to take my notes, more specifically doom emacs. I was irritated the other day and felt that my notes did not seem like it was reaching the standard for zettelkasten. My different kinds of notes are atomic, source, tags, reference, and fleeting. I link all these as nodes, so theres not really much identification but just notes linking to other notes. It looks nice visually (org-roam) but I feel like something is missing? Any Ideas? Thoughts? Thank you
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
I'm curious how you prompted the AI. Have you tried something like this?
Thanks! I will try those questions. I really went down a rabbit hole getting my head around zettelkasten, apparently taking notes digitally has a new architecture than was Niklas Luhmann implemented. Its more atomic when making notes on an app..
I came to similar conclusions after getting lost in that same rabbit hole. :-)
Sascha's and Christian's "Zettelkasten Method" makes much more sense to me, since I approach it as hypertext.
Nori's blog post describes methodological differences to Luhmann:
What about portability? How do you use those notes if you use a different app in the future? One of the key ideas of a Zettelkasten is that it could potentially become a lifetime system, over the course of not just years but decades. Are you sure emacs will still be around in 20 or 30 years, and that you'll still be using it?
I recommend thinking about a portable format that will be independent of app choice. This usually means something close to plain text, like markdown. It also usually means your notes being saved as files, not as a database that you'd have to export in the future... and hope that the export isn't a huge pain to deal with.