Preferred version of EMACS for the Archive?
It seem likes there are a good number of people using the Archive with EMACS. Can anyone recommend a preferred version of EMACS to use with the Archive? GNU? CarbonEmacs? XEmacs? and Aquamacs?
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
I would think GNU since it's by far the most popular.
:wq
Thanks for responding to my query. That's the version I used in the past, but it's been a few years. Back in the days of UNIX System V.
It's probably come a long way since then but it should still be familiar.
:wq
Really, anything will work. I'm using
doom
, which is a kitted-out full conversion, and before that I was using the one from emacsforosx.com, whatever that is. Honestly, interoperability with The Archive is the least of your concerns, as long as it can rundeft
andzetteldeft
, you should be good. Check for dependencies on those, and you're good.