Search
-
How to deal with arbitrariness when using object tags for qualities?
Hello! Yesterday, I experienced a situation that I'm surprised I didn't notice before. When we use object tags, we seek to identify the objects interacting in a note's main argument. However, there are times when those objects may refer to qualities one may or may not have. For example, let's imagine I have two different… -
Re: How to deal with arbitrariness when using object tags for qualities?
Ah, I overlooked the paragraph: These would be my tags: #versionlock #versionpromiscuity The tag "#dependency-version-range" would be either a topic tag or you consciously add it as an implicitly used object, similar to the note in the course (#attachement as an implicitly used concept in the definition of mindfulness)… -
Re: How to deal with arbitrariness when using object tags for qualities?
Thanks @ctietze , @JasperMcFly , @andang76 , @Sascha and @tjex for your answers! You have helped me to go much deeper into the use of object tags :-) I have finished processing the whole Semantic Versioning webpage. Now I have an overview of how all the ideas fit together and I can clearly see that using #strict and #relax… -
Re: How to deal with arbitrariness when using object tags for qualities?
I'd have a specific concept that would be implicitly mentioned in the notes. Or, also likely, don't tag it with anything like #strictness because it is not one of the main concepts used as a building block for the idea at hand.